Palabras clave
Doubao
escritura en inglés como lengua extranjera (EFL)
retroalimentación asistida por IA
colaboración entre IA y humanos
Cómo citar
Resumen
En respuesta a la política de alfabetización en IA de China para la educación primaria y secundaria, este estudio examina las experiencias y percepciones de los estudiantes de secundaria sobre el uso de Doubao, una herramienta doméstica de IA generativa, para la retroalimentación escrita en inglés. Este estudio de caso de métodos mixtos involucró a 90 estudiantes de EFL de Grado 11 de una escuela secundaria modelo provincial en China durante un semestre. Los datos se recopilaron a través de evaluaciones de escritura pre/post-test, un Cuestionario de Experiencia del Curso (CEQ) de 20 ítems y entrevistas. Los resultados cuantitativos mostraron una alta confiabilidad del CEQ (α = 0.950) y una mejora significativa en las puntuaciones de escritura desde la prueba previa (M = 21.72) hasta la prueba posterior (M = 24.50), con un tamaño del efecto medio (dz = 0.60). El análisis cualitativo identificó temas clave: el valor práctico de Doubao (retroalimentación instantánea, soporte de contenido), las limitaciones (interpretaciones erróneas del contexto) y las diferencias experienciales entre la IA y la retroalimentación humana. El estudio concluye que Doubao demuestra potencial como herramienta complementaria en la enseñanza de la escritura con orientación docente estructurada; sin embargo, su impacto puede diferir según los niveles de competencia de los estudiantes y los contextos de instrucción.
Citas
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.
Cheng, X., Zhang, L. J., & Yan, Q. (2021). Exploring teacher written feedback in EFL writing classrooms: Beliefs and practices in interaction. Language Teaching Research, 29, 385-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211057665.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygostkian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). New Jersey: Ablex.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chambers, A. B. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction: A review of reviews. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 211–226). The Guilford Press.
Hyland, K. (2025). EFL teachers and feedback fatigue: AI to the rescue? Language Teaching, 1, 17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444825101018
Ironsi, C. S., & Ironsi, S. S. (2025). Experimental evidence for the efficacy of generative AI in improving students’ writing skills. Quality Assurance in Education, 33(2), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2024-0065
Jin, F., Sun, L., Pan, Y., & Lin, C.-H. (2025). High heels, compass, spider-man, or drug? Metaphor analysis of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing. Computers & Education, 228, 105248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105248
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103(2003), 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., et al. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1265-1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Knox, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1754236
Li, B., Tan, Y. L., Wang, C., & Lowell, V. (2025). Two years of innovation: A systematic review of empirical generative AI research in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100445
Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Biebricher, C. (2024). Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative AI-assisted digital multimodal composing and traditional writing. Computers & Education, 211, 104977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104977
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020). The English curriculum standards for senior high school (2017 edition, revised in 2020). People’s Education Press.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2024, December 3). China to enhance AI education in primary, secondary schools. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China.
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), Article 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050
Mizumoto, A., Shintani, N., Sasaki, M., & Teng, M. F. (2024). Testing the intelligence viability of ChatGPT as a companion in L2 writing accuracy assessment. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(2), Article 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100116
Moltudal, S. H., Gamlem, S. M., Segaran, M., & Engeness, I. (2025). Same assignment—two different feedback contexts: Lower secondary students’ experiences with feedback during a three draft writing process. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1509904. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1509904
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Peterson, R. A., & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 194-198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030767
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). Content validity: The neglected component of measurement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(6), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03932.x
Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M., & Olson, C. B. (2024). Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Learning and Instruction, 91, Article 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894
Tan, Y. L., & Gao, L. (2025). Pointing to Context from a Relevance Theory Perspective: A Comparative Study of Human and Machine Interpreting. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2025-0023
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZW9535
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Yu, G., Lin, Y., & Li, Y. (2024). Generative AI as a new content productivity:Development limitations and future approaches. View on Publishing, 14, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.16491/j.cnki.cn45-1216/g2.2024.14.004
Zhang, Y., & Yu, Z. (2025). Emotional attachment as the key mediator: Expanding UTAUT2 to examine how perceived anthropomorphism in intelligent agents influences the sustained use of DouBao (Cici) among EFL learners. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13721-3
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2026 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México